Joseph Holler's Open GIScience Curriculum at Middlebury College
Oct-03 : In this lesson, we will study a climate vulnerability model of Malawi.
Malcomb, D. W., E. A. Weaver, and A. R. Krakowka. 2014. Vulnerability modeling for sub-Saharan Africa: An operationalized approach in Malawi. Applied Geography 48:17–30. DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.004
Our next GIS analysis challenge is to reproduce the Malcomb et al (2014) paper cited above. Our first task in doing so is to understand the data and methods applied in this paper to the fullest extent and greatest detail possible, before we study and improve upon an implementation of the methods in R.
To this goal, please take notes on:
In addition, you may want to think about the construct validity of the paper in terms of the relationship between theoretical concepts and the quantitative/spatial measurements and analytical tools used to represent the concepts in GIS.
Be prepared to draw workflow diagrams for the analysis in this research paper, especially the data and steps required to produce figure 4 and figure 5.
Geographic research studies often result in choropleth maps. If we want to reproduce those studies and compare our results, then we will need a quantitative method for comparing our reproduced qualitative maps to the originals.
There are many established concepts methods for assessing agreement, error, and uncertainty in maps, including:
These methods are confounded by:
The Spearman’s Rho ranked correlation coefficient allows us to compare two sets of ordinal data